Wheels AccidentADVICE

Abogados de Appeals & Appellate

670 abogados de Appeals & Appellate encontrados. Filtre por estado y ciudad.

John T Burns Jr
John T Burns Jr

Jr & Partners

DivorceFamily LawAppeals & AppellateCollaborative Law
Apple Valley15+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Civil RightsCriminal LawNative American LawPersonal Injury
Coconino County48+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Johnnie Franks Woodruff
Johnnie Franks Woodruff

Woodruff Law Office

Family LawAppeals & AppellateCriminal LawDivorce
Florence20+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Jon David Huffman
Jon David Huffman

Huffman Injury Lawyers

Business LawReal Estate LawCollectionsConstruction Law
Dekalb County14+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Jon Dedon
Jon Dedon

Dedon Injury Lawyers

Cannabis & Marijuana LawAppeals & AppellateBusiness LawMarijuana Business Formation
Johnson County17+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Jon R. Rogers
Jon R. Rogers

The Rogers Firm

DivorceFamily LawEstate PlanningBankruptcy
Elkhart17+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Personal InjuryInsurance ClaimsMedical MalpracticeAppeals & Appellate
Fort Lauderdale25+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Jonathan  Rosenberg
Jonathan Rosenberg

Rosenberg & Partners

Criminal LawDUI & DWIAppeals & AppellateWhite Collar Crime
Binghamton14+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Jonathan Collins
Jonathan Collins

The Collins Firm

BankruptcyAppeals & AppellateArbitration & MediationBusiness Law
Gila County23+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Jonathan D. Csuka
Jonathan D. Csuka

Csuka & Associates

Family LawDivorceAppeals & AppellateArbitration & Mediation
Asheboro21+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Employment LawCivil RightsBusiness LawAppeals & Appellate
Jackson27+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Jonathan Ian Nirenberg
Jonathan Ian Nirenberg

The Nirenberg Firm

Employment LawCivil RightsBusiness LawAppeals & Appellate
East Brunswick27+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Jonathan Todd Sinn
Jonathan Todd Sinn

Sinn & Associates

Criminal LawDUI & DWIDomestic ViolenceTraffic Tickets
Akron31+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Joseph A. Gangi
Joseph A. Gangi

Gangi Law Office

Appeals & AppellateCriminal LawCivil RightsEmployment Law
Blue Earth County16+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Criminal LawAppeals & AppellateCriminal AppealsDrug Crimes
Fontana45+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Joseph Douglas Barics
Joseph Douglas Barics

The Barics Firm

DivorceAppeals & AppellateForeclosure DefenseFamily Law
Brentwood32+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Joseph E. Cheeley, III
Joseph E. Cheeley, III

Law Offices of Joseph E. Cheeley, III

DivorceFamily LawProbateEstate Planning
Buford46+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis
Joseph Ellis Jestus
Joseph Ellis Jestus

Jestus & Associates

Criminal LawDUI & DWIDomestic ViolenceTraffic Tickets
Commerce City9+ años exp. · Consulta Gratis

Appeals and Appellate Lawyers in the United States

Losing at trial doesn't always mean the fight is over. An appellate lawyer reviews what happened in your case and argues to a higher court that legal errors affected the outcome. Appellate work is a distinct skill set — it's about legal research, written persuasion, and oral argument, not witness testimony or jury selection.

What Appellate Law Covers

Appellate attorneys handle cases after a trial court or administrative body has issued a decision. They file appeals in intermediate appellate courts, state supreme courts, and federal circuit courts, all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. The goal is to identify reversible errors — mistakes in how the law was applied, how evidence was admitted, or how jury instructions were given.

Appeals can arise from criminal convictions, civil judgments, family law orders, administrative rulings, and regulatory decisions. Appellate lawyers also draft amicus briefs and handle writs, including writs of certiorari and habeas corpus petitions. According to federal court data, only about 10-15% of civil appeals result in a reversal or remand, which makes the quality of appellate briefing extremely significant.

When to Hire an Appellate Lawyer

  • You received an unfavorable verdict at trial and believe the judge made legal errors
  • You need to defend a favorable ruling that the opposing party is appealing
  • A government agency denied your claim or license after an administrative hearing
  • Your criminal conviction involved improper jury instructions, prosecutorial misconduct, or constitutional violations
  • You want a strategic assessment of whether your case has strong grounds for appeal before committing resources

How the Appellate Process Works

The process starts with filing a notice of appeal within strict deadlines — often 30 days from the final judgment. Missing this window can permanently forfeit your right to appeal. Your attorney then orders the trial record and transcripts.

The core of any appeal is the written brief. Your lawyer identifies errors, researches case law, and constructs arguments explaining why the lower court got it wrong. The opposing side files a response brief, and you may file a reply. Some courts schedule oral arguments, though many appeals are decided on the briefs alone. The entire process typically takes 6 to 18 months.

How Appellate Outcomes Are Determined

  • Reversal — the appellate court overturns the lower court's decision entirely, which may restore damages previously denied or vacate a judgment against you
  • Remand — the case gets sent back to the trial court for a new trial or recalculation of damages based on corrected legal standards
  • Modification of monetary awards if the appellate court finds the original calculation was based on an incorrect legal standard
  • Reinstatement of claims that were improperly dismissed, reopening the path to full recovery

Frequently Asked Questions

Can new evidence be introduced on appeal?

Generally, no. Appellate courts review the existing trial record for legal errors. They don't hear new testimony or consider evidence that wasn't presented below. The exception is rare circumstances involving newly discovered evidence that couldn't have been found earlier through reasonable effort.

What is the standard of review?

Appellate courts apply different levels of scrutiny depending on the issue. Pure legal questions receive de novo review, meaning the court decides the issue fresh. Factual findings are reviewed under a deferential standard — the court asks whether the trial judge's findings were clearly erroneous, not whether it would have reached a different conclusion.